Archives
- 01/18/2004 - 01/25/2004
- 01/25/2004 - 02/01/2004
- 02/01/2004 - 02/08/2004
- 02/08/2004 - 02/15/2004
- 02/15/2004 - 02/22/2004
- 02/22/2004 - 02/29/2004
- 02/29/2004 - 03/07/2004
- 05/30/2004 - 06/06/2004
- 11/14/2004 - 11/21/2004
- 11/28/2004 - 12/05/2004
- 12/05/2004 - 12/12/2004
- 12/26/2004 - 01/02/2005
- 03/13/2005 - 03/20/2005
- 03/27/2005 - 04/03/2005
- 04/03/2005 - 04/10/2005
- 04/10/2005 - 04/17/2005
- 04/17/2005 - 04/24/2005
- 04/24/2005 - 05/01/2005
- 05/01/2005 - 05/08/2005
- 05/08/2005 - 05/15/2005
- 05/15/2005 - 05/22/2005
- 06/12/2005 - 06/19/2005
- 06/19/2005 - 06/26/2005
- 07/03/2005 - 07/10/2005
- 07/17/2005 - 07/24/2005
- 07/24/2005 - 07/31/2005
- 06/18/2006 - 06/25/2006
You'd be surprised.
Tuesday, April 26, 2005
Did Marine murder Iraqis? Hearing to weigh evidence - International News - MSNBC.com:"Pantano was investigated and cleared at the field level last year and continued combat operations"
"But civilian defense lawyer Charles Gittins said a disgruntled enlisted man complained after Pantano's unit returned to Camp Lejeune. A new probe led to the charge."
If we was already "cleared" or as I like to call it "found innnocent", how can an investigation be reopened? This is a rediculous waste of tax payer money.
"But civilian defense lawyer Charles Gittins said a disgruntled enlisted man complained after Pantano's unit returned to Camp Lejeune. A new probe led to the charge."
If we was already "cleared" or as I like to call it "found innnocent", how can an investigation be reopened? This is a rediculous waste of tax payer money.
Posted by: 
/ 12:59 PM
/ 12:59 PM- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -